Fujitsu: G-PON System (2006 PDF)
Filed in:
BPON,
EPON,
fujitsu,
GPON,
Hybrid PON
Subscribe To FTTX News
Posts
Comments
skip to main |
skip to sidebar
Posts
Comments
|
A list of links to the day's news stories about FTTP, FTTH, FTTN, and FTTC. Use this as a research tool to keep track of what is happening and what has happened in the various FTTX fields. |
Posts
Comments
Keywords
FTTP Deployments Around the World
Latest Comments
Administrative Notes
This blog has many purposes, but is probably best used as a feed source in other web pages. See the post feed link at the bottom of the page.
Additional editors and contributors are being solicited. Please email if you'd like to be added to the blog.
Additional editors and contributors are being solicited. Please email if you'd like to be added to the blog.
Sources
- Fiber to the Home Council
- FTTxtra
- Fiber Evolution Blog
- Fibre to the home UK
- Australian FTTH News
- Fibre Optique France
- Broadband Prime (Greece)
- Jim Baller's daily Baller-Herbst email
- Broadband Trends
- Broadband Properties
- LightReading
- Lightwave magazine
- SearchTelecom.com
- Telecommunications Magazine
- Telephony Online
- USTelecom dailyLead
- Fiber to the Whatever
- Others - please email with suggestions
3 Comments:
OK, so this paper is almost 2 years old, but I just ran across it in a search. It's interesting to see the grand plans Fujitsu had for GPON in North America. They even publicly wrote about Hybrid PON (now an Alcatel marketing pitch).
It almost makes you forget that Fujitsu abandoned the North American PON market altogether about a year later.
Didn't help their cause that they say GE-PON can only support a 1x16 split or less. Little errors like that one can make it easy to second guess their other statements.
Actually, I believe that the standard for GE-PON was originally 1:16. At least it used to be. However, you are correct that implementations up to 1:64 are now claimed by the GE-PON folks. No one making a legitimate competitive comparison between GE-PON and GPON would handicap it that way now.
Just giving the authors the benefit of the doubt. Maybe that's the way they deployed it in Japan.
Post a Comment